Definition of armed conflict given by appeals chamber of the international criminal tribunal9/24/2023 Kordic and Cerkez, (Trial Chamber), February 26, 2001, para. 251: “The armed conflict requirement is satisfied by proof that there was an armed conflict.” Tadic, (Appeals Chamber), July 15, 1999, para. (iii) The attack must be ‘directed against any civilian population.’ (iv) The attack must be ‘widespread or systematic.’ (v) The perpetrator must know of the wider context in which his acts occur and know that his acts are part of the attack.” i) the Statute requires that there must be an armed conflict (element 1) (ii) The acts of the perpetrator must be part of the attack. 410: In addition to the statutory requirement of an armed conflict, the following sub-elements are necessary: “(i) There must be an attack. Kunarac, Kovac and Vukovic, (Trial Chamber), February 22, 2001, para. (i) other inhumane acts.” b) General elements (h) persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds “The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons responsible for the following crimes when committed in armed conflict, whether international or internal in character, and directed against any civilian population: > IV) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (Article 5) a) Statute Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: IV) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (Article 5)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |